Human immunodeficiency virus 1 dual-target nucleic acid technology improves blood safety: 5 years of experience of the German Red Cross blood donor service Baden-Württemberg-Hessen.

BACKGROUND: RNA viruses are associated with a high frequency of mutations because of the missing proofreading function of polymerases, such as reverse transcriptase. Between 2007 and 2010, six blood donations with false-negative nucleic acid technology (NAT) results were reported in Germany. Therefore, NAT screening in two viral genome regions was introduced by our blood donation service in 2010 on a voluntary basis and became mandatory in Germany since the beginning of 2015. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Blood donor screening was done using, in parallel, the German Red Cross (GRC) HIV-1 CE long terminate repeats (LTR) PCR kit and the GRC HIV-1 gag CE PCR kit. In total, 7 million blood donations were screened during the study period from 2010 to 2014 with the GRC dual-target human immunodeficiency virus 1 (HIV-1) NAT system. Additionally, three suspicious specimens were analyzed by four monotargeted NAT assays and by five dual-target NAT assays. RESULTS: Three of 7 million donations tested negative using the 5'LTR-polymerase chain reaction, but they were positive if amplification was performed in the gag region. HIV antibodies were detected in all three donations. Nucleic acid sequence analysis identified a deletion of 22 bases within the 5'LTR probe binding region. Three different ltr-based monotargeted assays missed two donations, except for a low-reactive result obtained by one of the assays. In total, the detection rates for HIV-1-positive donations were 37.5% (3/8) for monotargeted assays and 100% (10/10) for dual-target assays. CONCLUSION: The current data demonstrate that dual-target NAT systems reduce the risk of false-negative HIV-1 NAT screening results.

Evaluation of the effectiveness of a pathogen inactivation technology against clinically relevant transfusion-transmitted bacterial strains.

BACKGROUND: To increase blood safety, various procedures are currently implemented, including donor selection, optimized donor arm disinfection, and diversion. In addition, pathogen inactivation (PI) techniques can be used for platelets (PLTs) and plasma concentrates. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: This study investigated the clinical efficacy of an inactivation technique for different blood components at two time points (12 and 35.5 hr). Eight transfusion-relevant bacterial strains were spiked at two different concentrations (100 and 1000 colony-forming units [CFUs]/bag) into whole blood (WB), apheresis PLTs (APs), and buffy coat (BC)-derived minipool PLTs. RESULTS: The bacterial concentrations were higher than 10(6) CFUs/mL within 24 hours after spiking depending on the particular bacterial strain. PI was absolute for all of the APs performed 12 hours after inoculation, but the bacterial strains of Klebsiella pneumoniae and Bacillus cereus were not completely inactivated in WB or BC PLTs, performed 35.5 and 12 hours after inoculation, respectively. CONCLUSION: The INTERCEPT PI system was not 100% effective for high concentrations of certain K. pneumoniae strains or spore-forming B. cereus. A critical observation was that the period between blood donation and inactivation needs to be minimal to enable efficient PI. In the case where PI cannot be performed immediately after preparation, a combination of a PI technology after the production of blood components with a rapid bacterial screen test on Day 4 or 5 after donation may offer a solution to further prevent the risk of bacterial transmission by transfusion.

A validation protocol and evaluation algorithms to determine compatibility of cell therapy product matrices in microbiological testing.

As part of product release testing, "sterility" of cellular therapy products, using formally validated methods, must be demonstrated, irrespective of whether products are released and administered while microbiological results are pending or whether these can be awaited. Components of the matrix, i.e. the carrier fluid and the therapeutic cells, could potentially inhibit bacterial growth and may thus obscure their presence, resulting in false-negative data. The European Pharmacopoeia and equivalent guidelines therefore specify that for each cell therapy product the specific matrix' compatibility with validated detection methods is formally established. There for, matrix is spiked with known numbers of representative aerobic and anaerobic agents, cultured in automated systems such as BacT/ALERT, followed by microbiological species identification from culture-positive bottles. We here propose an easy-to-follow protocol for matrix validation and demonstrate its successful execution with a panel of novel advanced therapy medicinal products and standard cell therapy products, as well as algorithms for interpretation of conflicting results between BacT/Alert and culture methods. This protocol can serve as a basis for microbiological method (matrix) validations for cellular preparations.

Emerging Pathogens - How Safe is Blood?

During the last few decades, blood safety efforts were mainly focused on preventing viral infections. However, humanity's increased mobility and improved migration pathways necessitate a global perspective regarding other transfusion-transmitted pathogens. This review focuses on the general infection risk of blood components for malaria, dengue virus, Trypanosoma cruzi (Chagas disease) and Babesia spp. Approximately 250 million people become infected by Plasmodium spp. per year. Dengue virus affects more than 50 million people annually in more than 100 countries; clinically, it can cause serious diseases, such as dengue haemorrhagic fever and dengue shock syndrome. Chagas disease, which is caused by Trypanosoma cruzi, mainly occurs in South America and infects approximately 10 million people annually. Babesia spp. is a parasitic infection that infects red blood cells; although many infections are asymptomatic, severe clinical disease has been reported, especially in the elderly. Screening assays are available for all considered pathogens but make screening strategies more complex and more expensive. A general pathogen inactivation for all blood components (whole blood) promises to be a long-term, sustainable solution for both known and unknown pathogens. Transfusion medicine therefore eagerly awaits such a system.

Perioperative Red Blood Cell Transfusion: Harmful or Beneficial to the Patient?

Although the transfusion of red blood cells (RBCs) is safer than ever regarding infections, it is still associated with several adverse reactions and therefore should only be used on the basis of evidence-based triggers. However, prevention of RBC transfusion and subsequent substitution of blood losses with acellular solutions will inevitably result in dilutional anemia. Acute dilutional anemia can be compensated by the body over a wide range of hemoglobin concentrations without a critical restriction of tissue oxygenation. On the other hand, chronic anemia is known to be a potent cause of morbidity and mortality. As a consequence, the impact of perioperative anemia on mortality is difficult to describe, because anemia, as well as the transfusion of RBCs, can influence the clinical outcome. The resulting 'Gordian knot' cannot be cut easily, and this circumstance forces clinical physicians to make a daily trade-off between transfusion-associated and anemia-associated risks. This review focuses on the physiology of oxygen transport, the hazards of acute anemia, the hazards of RBC transfusion, and the literature putting these problems into perspective.

Implementation of Bacterial Detection Methods into Blood Donor Screening - Overview of Different Technologies.

SUMMARY: BACKGROUND: Through the implementation of modern technology, such as nucleic acid testing, over the last two decades, blood safety has improved considerably in that the risk of viral infection is less than 1 in a million blood transfusions. By contrast, the residual risk of transfusion-associated bacterial infection is stable at approximately 1 in 2,000 to 1 in 3,000 in platelets. To improve blood safety with regard to bacterial infections, many countries have implemented bacterial screening methods as part of their blood donor screening programmes. METHODS: BACTERIAL DETECTION METHODS ARE CLUSTERED INTO THREE GROUPS: i) culture methods in combination with the 'negative-to-date' concept, ii) rapid detection systems with a late sample collection, and iii) bedside screening tests. RESULTS: The culture methods are convincing because of their very high analytical sensitivity. Nevertheless, false-negative culture results and subsequent fatalities were reported in several countries. Rapid bacterial systems are characterised as having short testing time but reduced sensitivity. Sample errors are prevented by late sample collection. Finally, bedside tests reduce the risk for sample errors to a minimum, but testing outside of blood donation services may have risks for general testing failures. CONCLUSION: Bacterial screening of blood products, especially platelets, can be performed using a broad range of technologies. Each system exhibits advantages and disadvantages and offers only a temporary solution until a general pathogen inactivation technology is available for all blood components.

Recipients potentially infected with parvovirus B19 by red blood cell products.

BACKGROUND: Since 2000, blood donor screening for parvovirus B19 (B19) by nucleic acid testing (NAT) at the Ulm Institute has been conducted 6 to 8 weeks postdonation, that is, after transfusion of cellular blood products, whereas at the Frankfurt Institute all donations are screened before releasing any blood product. In this study, we evaluated the infectivity of B19-positive blood products in relation to the virus concentration in the transfused blood component. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Recipients were classified into two groups (A, transfused with blood products with B19 virus load less than 10(5) IU/mL; and B, transfused with blood products with B19 virus load greater than 10(5) IU/mL). Phylogenetic analyses were done for B19 DNA-positive donor and recipient pairs in the variant VP-1u genome region. All samples were investigated for immunoglobulin (Ig)M and IgG B19 antibodies. RESULTS: B19 DNA was detected in 9 of 18 recipients of red blood cells (RBCs) from Group B, whereas none of the 16 recipients of RBCs from Group A were positive for B19 DNA (p=0.016). Phylogenetic analysis demonstrated identical genomic sequences between the donors and recipients. Because recipient B19 DNA and antibody results were not available before transfusion, we interpret our overall data to indicate equivocal evidence of B19 transmission by RBC transfusion. CONCLUSION: B19 transmission by cellular blood products correlates with the virus concentration and the concentration of neutralizing antibodies. Thus, blood donor screening for B19 by minipool NAT should be done to supply at-risk patients (e.g., immunosuppressed patients) with B19-negative blood components.

Screening of platelet concentrates for bacterial contamination: spectrum of bacteria detected, proportion of transfused units, and clinical follow-up.

Screening of platelet concentrates (PCs) for bacterial contamination with cultivation methods is carried out as a routine procedure in some countries. The aim is to prevent the transfusion of contaminated PCs. The German Evaluation of Regular Monitoring Study Group conducted a prospective multicenter study on 52,243 PCs to investigate the prevalence of bacteria (BacT/ALERT, bioMerieux). This study describes the detected bacterial spectrum, the proportion of PCs with a positive test result that had been transfused, and the results of the clinical follow-up. One hundred thirteen (67%) of 169 potentially or confirmed positive units had already been transfused at the time of the first positive signal. The transfusion of units contaminated by Staphylococcus aureus, Serratia marcescens, and 73% of the units contaminated with Staphylococcus epidermidis, Staphylococcus capitis, or Staphylococcus saccharolyticus was prevented. In contrast, 85% of units with Propionibacterium acnes were transfused. A clonal relationship of the isolates from the pooled PCs and from the associated red blood cell concentrates was found in all investigated cases. The follow-up revealed six febrile reactions to culture-positive PCs not classified as transfusion reaction (TRs) by treating physicians. This demonstrates the importance of hemovigilance. Serious septic reactions due to Klebsiella pneumoniae in two units of one apheresis PC that had tested false-negative were reported; one had a fatal outcome. Culture systems reduce the risk of transfusion of contaminated PCs but cannot guarantee sterility. Physicians must be aware of bacterial contamination of PCs as a potential cause of TRs and must report all adverse events.

First transmission of human immunodeficiency virus Type 1 by a cellular blood product after mandatory nucleic acid screening in Germany.

BACKGROUND: In February 2007, a 63-year-old man underwent surgery. Retrospective testing with nucleic acid testing (NAT) showed that the patient was human immunodeficiency virus Type 1 (HIV-1) positive 10 days after transfusion. The transfusion-transmitted infection had been identified by a donor-related lookback started in April 2007 after anti-HIV seroconversion. METHODS: Sequence analysis was performed in the gag-pol region as well as in the V3 loop env region. Archived plasma from the transmitting donation was investigated for the individual-donation NAT with the Roche COBAS AmpliPrep/COBAS TaqMan HIV-1 test (Roche CAP/CTM HIV-1 test) and for HIV antigen/antibody combination testing (Abbott Architect). Additional testing was done on the donor's follow-up sample and on the recipient's sample. RESULTS: The Roche CAP/CTM HIV-1 test failed to detect viral RNA by minipool NAT in the index donation (April 2007) as well as in the donation that caused the infection (January 2007). Phylogenetic analysis showed a very high genetic similarity among viral sequences from both donor and recipient, proving the HIV-1 transmission by sequence data. CONCLUSION: This case represents the first documented HIV-1 transmission by transfusion of red blood cells after mandatory introduction of HIV-1 NAT for blood screening in Germany. Low viral load and mismatches in the primer/probe region might explain the detection failure of the NAT screening assay. A certain risk remains that new virus variants contain mutations at positions critical for amplification or detection of viral genomes. An option to reduce the risk of a detection failure by NAT is the simultaneous use of several conserved regions as amplification targets.

Bacterial contamination of platelet concentrates: results of a prospective multicenter study comparing pooled whole blood-derived platelets and apheresis platelets.

BACKGROUND: The GERMS Group initiated a prospective multicenter study to assess prevalence and nature of bacterial contamination of pooled buffy-coat platelet concentrates (PPCs) and apheresis platelet concentrates (APCs) by routine screening with a bacterial culture system. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: In nine centers overall, 52,243 platelet (PLT) concentrates (15,198 APCs, 37,045 PPCs) were analyzed by aerobic and anaerobic cultures (BacT/ALERT, bioMérieux). RESULTS: In 135 PLT concentrates (PCs; 0.26%), bacteria could be identified in the first culture (0.4% for APCs vs. 0.2% for PPCs; p < 0.001). In 37 (0.07%) of these PC units, the same bacteria strain could be identified in a second culture from the sample bag and/or the PC unit. The rate of confirmed-positive units did not differ significantly between APC (0.09%; 1/1169) and PPC units (0.06%; 1/1544). Bacteria from skin flora (Propionibacterium acnes, Staphylococcus epidermidis) were the most prevalent contaminants. Median times to first positive culture from start of incubation were 0.7 and 3.7 days in aerobic and anaerobic cultures for confirmed-positive units. With a "negative-to-date" issue strategy, most PC units (55%) had already been issued by time of the first positive culture. CONCLUSION: The rate of confirmed bacterial contamination of PC units was low. Nevertheless, clinicians must be aware of this risk. The risk of bacterial contamination does not warrant universal preference of APCs. It must be questioned whether routine bacterial screening by a culture method can sufficiently prevent contaminated products from being transfused due to the delay until a positive signal in the culture system and due to false-negative results.

Optimized Scansystem platelet kit for bacterial detection with enhanced sensitivity: detection within 24 h after spiking.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: The prevention and detection of bacterial contamination of platelet concentrates remains a major challenge for transfusion medicine. To be suitable for blood-transfusion services, the contamination detection method must be highly sensitive, easy to perform and preferably of low cost. In this spiking study, we evaluated the new optimized Scansystem Platelet Kit detection method for use on apheresis platelets. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Apheresis platelet concentrates (APCs) were individually spiked with 10 colony-forming units (CFU)/ml of one of 10 different strains of bacteria. The spiked APCs were analysed at specific time-points during incubation by using the optimized Scansystem Platelet Kit. Bacterial enumeration was performed by plating onto blood agar. RESULTS: All the bacterial strains tested were detected by using the optimized Scansystem Platelet Kit when sampled 24 h after spiking. Compared to the Scansystem standard kit, sensitivity was increased to < 50 CFU/ml. The identity of the spiked bacteria was confirmed by Gram staining and DNA fingerprinting. CONCLUSION: The optimized Scansystem Platelet Kit was able to reliably detect, within 70 min, 10 transfusion-relevant bacterial species in APCs when a sample volume was taken 24 h after spiking. This is the first study carried out by using the optimized Scansystem bacterial detection that was found to have an enhanced sensitivity compared to the standard kit.

Yield of HCV and HIV-1 NAT after screening of 3.6 million blood donations in central Europe.

BACKGROUND: HCV and HIV-1 NAT of all blood donations was initiated at our institutions in January 1997 to reduce the residual risk of transfusion-transmitted virus infections. The yield of NAT after testing more than 3.6 million donations in central Europe is reported. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Automated pipetting instruments were used to pool up to 96 donor samples including those that were antibody reactive. To compensate for dilution of the individual donor samples by pooling, viruses were enriched from the pools by centrifugation at 48,000 x g. A commercial PCR (Cobas Amplicor, Roche) and an in-house PCR were applied for HCV and HIV-1 amplification, respectively. RESULTS: Six HCV and 2 HIV-1 PCR confirmed-positive, antibody-negative donations (yield, 1 in 600,000 and 1 in 1.8 million, respectively) were identified. Thirty-nine and 11 multiple-time donors seroconverted for HCV and HIV, respectively, and look-back procedures were initiated. Archived samples from preseroconversion donations were thawed and retested by single-sample PCR and remained negative. The recipients of the blood components were traced and tested. All traced recipients were negative for HCV and HIV antibodies. CONCLUSION: The yield of NAT in central European Red Cross blood donors was less than expected from theoretical calculations for American and German multiple-time donors. Look-back procedures for HCV and HIV indicated that no donation given before seroconversion of the donor was missed by minipool PCR. Sensitivity of minipool PCR testing after virus enrichment seems to be sufficiently high to close the diagnostic window almost completely.

NAT for HBV and anti-HBc testing increase blood safety.

BACKGROUND: Routine HBV PCR screening of blood donations to our institutes was introduced in January 1997 to complete the NAT screening program for transfusion-relevant viruses. Testing was successively extended to customer transfusion services with a total of 1,300,000 samples tested per year. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Minipools of 96 blood donation samples were formed by automatic pipettors. HBsAg-reactive samples were included. HBV particles were enriched from the minipools by centrifugation. Conventional and in-house TaqMan PCRs were successively applied for HBV amplification. Sensitivity reached 1000 genome equivalents per mL for each individual donation. Confirmatory single-sample and single-sample enrichment PCRs were established with sensitivities of 300 and 5 to 10 genome equivalents per mL, respectively. RESULTS: After screening of 3.6 million donor samples, 6 HBV PCR-positive, HBsAg-negative donations were identified. Two samples were from infected donors who had not seroconverted and four were from chronic anti-HBc-positive low-level HBV carriers. Retesting by single-sample PCR of 432 samples confirmed positive for HBsAg identified 37 donations that were negative in minipool PCR. Donor-directed look-back procedures indicated that no infected donor who had not yet seroconverted was missed by minipool PCR. However, recipient-directed look-back procedures revealed two anti-HBc-positive recipients of HBsAg-negative minipool PCR-negative, anti-HBc-positive and single-sample PCR-positive blood components. After testing randomly selected 729 HBsAg-negative minipool PCR-negative, anti-HBc-positive donors by single-sample enrichment PCR, 7 were identified with < or = 10 HBV particles per mL of donor plasma. CONCLUSION: Minipool PCR testing after virus enrichment was sensitive enough to identify HBsAg-negative donors who had seroconverterd and HBsAg-negative, anti-HBc-positive chronic HBV carriers. HBV NAT in conjunction with anti-HBc screening would reduce the residual risk of transfusion-transmitted HBV infection.